Hegel Vs Schopenhauer: A Clash of Philosophical Titans


Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel and Arthur Schopenhauer are two seminal figures in the history of Western philosophy. Both Germans, their philosophies left indelible marks on the intellectual landscape of the 19th century and beyond. However, despite their commonalities in time and place, their views on metaphysics and the nature of reality were often diametrically opposed. Schopenhauer, in particular, was highly critical of Hegel’s philosophy, accusing him of being a charlatan and of intentionally using complex, obfuscating language. This critique was just one part of a broader philosophical dispute that pitted Schopenhauer’s metaphysics of the “will” against Hegel’s “absolute idealism.”

Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel: Absolute Idealism

Hegel’s philosophical system, often referred to as “absolute idealism,” was groundbreaking in its scope and complexity. Born in 1770, Hegel sought to articulate a comprehensive and systematic account of reality that would integrate all aspects of human and natural existence. At the heart of his philosophy is the concept of the “Absolute,” a unifying principle that reconciles all differences and oppositions in a higher unity.

For Hegel, reality is a rational structure in which everything is interconnected in a dialectical process, evolving through stages of thesis, antithesis, and synthesis. This process, which Hegel calls the “dialectic,” is a way of understanding how ideas or realities develop and change over time. Hegel believed that this process ultimately led to the unfolding of the Absolute and that by understanding this, one could attain a comprehensive view of the universe and our place within it.

Hegel’s philosophy was not limited to abstract metaphysics. His ideas had significant implications for ethics, political philosophy, theology, and aesthetics, and his thought has been influential in a wide range of academic disciplines.

Arthur Schopenhauer: Metaphysics of the Will

Schopenhauer, born in 1788, developed a philosophy that stands in stark contrast to Hegel’s absolute idealism. For Schopenhauer, the fundamental reality is not an Absolute Idea, but rather the “will.” He viewed the will as an irrational force that drives all human action and desire, and he saw human life as fundamentally characterized by suffering resulting from insatiable wants.
In contrast to Hegel’s optimistic vision of human progress through the dialectic, Schopenhauer proposed a more pessimistic view of existence. He suggested that the best we can hope for is to minimize our desires and thereby reduce our suffering, a view that resonates with Buddhist and other Eastern philosophies.

Schopenhauer’s Attack on Hegel

While Schopenhauer respected some of his philosophical predecessors, notably Immanuel Kant, he had little respect for Hegel. He frequently accused Hegel of being a charlatan who used deliberately obfuscating language to conceal the emptiness of his ideas. Schopenhauer went as far as to call Hegel’s philosophy “a colossal piece of mystification” that would soon be forgotten.
Schopenhauer was particularly critical of Hegel’s dialectical method, arguing that it was an artificial and arbitrary system that had more to do with wordplay than with genuine philosophical understanding. He also took issue with Hegel’s metaphysical optimism, contrasting it with his own view of life as driven by irrational desires and characterized by suffering.


The intellectual conflict between Hegel and Schopenhauer is a fascinating chapter in the history of philosophy, representing a stark clash between optimism and pessimism, rationalism and irrationalism, and idealism and realism. While Hegel’s philosophy celebrates rationality, progress, and unity, Schopenhauer’s philosophy emphasizes the power of irrational desires, the inevitability of suffering, and the futility of human striving.

Despite their profound disagreements, both Hegel and Schopenhauer have left lasting legacies in Western thought, and their ideas continue to shape philosophical discourse to this day. The tension between their opposing views offers a rich field for exploration, providing a framework through which we can explore some of the most fundamental questions about human existence, the nature of reality, and our place in the universe.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Follow by Email